Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Condition for the higher rank numerical range to be non-empty

arXiv
Authors: Chi-Kwong Li, Yiu-Tung Poon, Nung-Sing Sze

Year

2007

Paper ID

50009

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

110

Citations

N/A

Abstract

It is shown that the rank-k numerical range of every n-by-n complex matrix is non-empty if n ge 3k - 2. The proof is based on a recent characterization of the rank-k numerical range by Li and Sze, the Helly's theorem on compact convex sets, and some eigenvalue inequalities. In particular, the result implies that Λ2(A) is non-empty if n ge 4. This confirms a conjecture of Choi et al. If 3k-2>n>0, an n-by-n complex matrix is given for which the rank-k numerical range is empty. Extension of the result to bounded linear operators acting on an infinite dimensional Hilbert space is also discussed.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • It is shown that the rank-k numerical range of every n-by-n complex matrix is non-empty if n ge 3k - 2.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #50009 #69032 Beyond the Canonical Protocol: ... #69027 Computational Superiority of No... #69013 Quantum correlations and cohere... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.