Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
An analytic study of the ionization from an ultrathin quantum well in a weak electrostatic field
arXiv
Authors: Ilki Kim
Year
2007
Paper ID
50000
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
128
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We consider the time evolution of a particle bound by an attractive one-dimensional delta-function potential at x = 0 when a uniform electrostatic field (F) is applied. We explore explicit expressions for the time-dependent wavefunction ψ_F(x,t) and the ionization probability {\mathcal{P}}(t), respectively, in the weak-field limit. In doing so, ψ_F(0,t) is a key element to their evaluation. We obtain a closed expression for ψ_F(0,t) which is an excellent approximation of the exact result being a numerical solution of the Lippmann-Schwinger integral equation. The resulting probability density |ψ_F(0,t)|^2, as a simple alternative to {\mathcal{P}}(t), is also in good agreement to its counterpart from the exact one. In doing this, we also find a new and useful integral identity of the Airy function.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We consider the time evolution of a particle bound by an attractive one-dimensional delta-function potential at x = 0 when a uniform electrostatic field (F) is applied.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.