Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

An analytic study of the ionization from an ultrathin quantum well in a weak electrostatic field

arXiv
Authors: Ilki Kim

Year

2007

Paper ID

50000

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

128

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We consider the time evolution of a particle bound by an attractive one-dimensional delta-function potential at x = 0 when a uniform electrostatic field (F) is applied. We explore explicit expressions for the time-dependent wavefunction ψ_F(x,t) and the ionization probability {\mathcal{P}}(t), respectively, in the weak-field limit. In doing so, ψ_F(0,t) is a key element to their evaluation. We obtain a closed expression for ψ_F(0,t) which is an excellent approximation of the exact result being a numerical solution of the Lippmann-Schwinger integral equation. The resulting probability density |ψ_F(0,t)|^2, as a simple alternative to {\mathcal{P}}(t), is also in good agreement to its counterpart from the exact one. In doing this, we also find a new and useful integral identity of the Airy function.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We consider the time evolution of a particle bound by an attractive one-dimensional delta-function potential at x = 0 when a uniform electrostatic field (F) is applied.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #50000 #69983 Spectral Leakage and Masking Ef... #69982 Dimensionality Reduction of QAO... #69981 A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Appr... #69980 Complexity Inequalities for Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.