Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Observation of back-action cancellation in interferometric and weak force measurements
arXiv
Authors: T. Caniard, P. Verlot, T. Briant, P. -F. Cohadon, A. Heidmann
Year
2007
Paper ID
49973
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
103
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We experimentally demonstrate a cancellation of back-action noise in optical measurements. Back-action cancellation was first proposed within the framework of gravitational-wave detection by dual resonators as a way to drastically improve their sensitivity. We have developed an experiment based on a high-finesse Fabry-Perot cavity to study radiation-pressure effects in ultra-sensitive displacement measurements. Using an intensity-modulated intracavity field to mimic the quantum radiation-pressure noise, we report the first observation of back-action cancellation due to a destructive interference between radiation-pressure effects on both mirrors of the cavity. We have observed a sensitivity improvement by a factor larger than 20 both in displacement and weak force measurements.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We experimentally demonstrate a cancellation of back-action noise in optical measurements.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.