Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Thermodynamics
Optimal quantum source coding with quantum information at the encoder and decoder
arXiv
Authors: Jon Yard, Igor Devetak
Year
2007
Paper ID
49908
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
139
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Consider many instances of an arbitrary quadripartite pure state of four quantum systems ABCD. Alice holds the AC part of each state, Bob holds B, while D represents all other parties correlated with ABC. Alice is required to redistribute the C systems to Bob while asymptotically preserving the overall purity. We prove that this is possible using Q qubits of communication and E ebits of shared entanglement between Alice and Bob, provided that Q geq I(C;D|B)/2 and Q+E geq H(C|B), proving the optimality of the Luo-Devetak outer bound. The optimal qubit rate provides the first known operational interpretation of quantum conditional mutual information. We also show how our protocol leads to a fully operational proof of strong subadditivity and uncover a general organizing principle, in analogy to thermodynamics, that underlies the optimal rates.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Consider many instances of an arbitrary quadripartite pure state of four quantum systems ABCD.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.