Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Simulation

Choice of Measurement Sets in Qubit Tomography

arXiv
Authors: Mark D de Burgh, Nathan K. Langford, Andrew C. Doherty, Alexei Gilchrist

Year

2007

Paper ID

49853

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

101

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Optimal generalized measurements for state estimation are well understood. However, practical quantum state tomography is typically performed using a fixed set of projective measurements and the question of how to choose these measurements has been largely unexplored in the literature. In this work we develop theoretical asymptotic bounds for the average fidelity of pure qubit tomography using measurement sets whose axes correspond to vertices of Platonic solids. We also present complete simulations of maximum likelihood tomography for mixed qubit states using the Platonic solid measurements. We show that overcomplete measurement sets can be used to improve the accuracy of tomographic reconstructions.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Optimal generalized measurements for state estimation are well understood.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #49853 #69038 Physically Constrained Ensemble... #69023 Scalable Quantum Algorithms for... #68990 Driving Exchange Interaction in... #68985 Floquet Entanglement Generation...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.