Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Reliable Final Computational Results from Faulty Quantum Computation
arXiv
Authors: Gerald Gilbert, Michael Hamrick, Yaakov S. Weinstein
Year
2007
Paper ID
49805
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
175
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this paper we extend both standard fault tolerance theory and Kitaev's model for quantum computation, combining them so as to yield quantitative results that reveal the interplay between the two. Our analysis establishes a methodology that allows us to quantitatively determine design parameters for a quantum computer, the values of which ensure that an overall computation of interest yields a correct *final result* with some prescribed probability of success, as opposed to merely ensuring that the desired *final quantum state* is obtained. As a specific example of the practical application of our approach, we explicitly calculate the number of levels of error correction concatenation needed to achieve a correct final result for the overall computation with some prescribed success probability. Since our methodology allows one to determine parameters required in order to achieve the correct final result for the overall quantum computation, as opposed to merely ensuring that the desired final quantum state is produced, our method enables the determination of complete quantum computational resource requirements associated to the actual solution of practical problems.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this paper we extend both standard fault tolerance theory and Kitaev's model for quantum computation, combining them so as to yield quantitative results that reveal the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.