Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Dynamical instability in kicked Bose-Einstein condensates: Bogoliubov resonances

arXiv
Authors: J. Reslen, C. E. Creffield, T. S. Monteiro

Year

2007

Paper ID

49700

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

117

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Bose-Einstein condensates subject to short pulses (`kicks') from standing waves of light represent a nonlinear analogue of the well-known chaos paradigm, the quantum kicked rotor. Previous studies of the onset of dynamical instability (ie exponential proliferation of non-condensate particles) suggested that the transition to instability might be associated with a transition to chaos. Here we conclude instead that instability is due to resonant driving of Bogoliubov modes. We investigate the excitation of Bogoliubov modes for both the quantum kicked rotor (QKR) and a variant, the double kicked rotor (QKR-2). We present an analytical model, valid in the limit of weak impulses which correctly gives the scaling properties of the resonances and yields good agreement with mean-field numerics.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Bose-Einstein condensates subject to short pulses (`kicks') from standing waves of light represent a nonlinear analogue of the well-known chaos paradigm, the quantum kicked rotor.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #49700 #77849 The pure Yang-Mills field, I: f... #77847 Fabrication of the Au/guaiazule... #77845 Quantum-mechanical model of vis... #77844 Nonequilibrium bosonization of ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.