Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation

PEPS as unique ground states of local Hamiltonians

arXiv
Authors: David Perez-Garcia, Frank Verstraete, J. Ignacio Cirac, Michael M. Wolf

Year

2007

Paper ID

49663

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

132

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this paper we consider projected entangled pair states (PEPS) on arbitrary lattices. We construct local parent Hamiltonians for each PEPS and isolate a condition under which the state is the unique ground state of the Hamiltonian. This condition, verified by generic PEPS and examples like the AKLT model, is an injective relation between the boundary and the bulk of any local region. While it implies the existence of an energy gap in the 1D case we will show that in certain cases (e.g., on a 2D hexagonal lattice) the parent Hamiltonian can be gapless with a critical ground state. To show this we invoke a mapping between classical and quantum models and prove that in these cases the injectivity relation between boundary and bulk solely depends on the lattice geometry.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this paper we consider projected entangled pair states (PEPS) on arbitrary lattices.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #49663 #69599 Tensor network compression usin... #69594 A Collective-Spin Derivation of... #69593 Local correlations in long-rang... #69592 Direct/adaptive-mixture phase-g...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.