Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Quantum Thermodynamics
On causally asymmetric versions of Occam's Razor and their relation to thermodynamics
arXiv
Authors: Dominik Janzing
Year
2007
Paper ID
49270
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
165
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In real-life statistical data, it seems that conditional probabilities for the effect given their causes tend to be less complex and smoother than conditionals for causes, given their effects. We have recently proposed and tested methods for causal inference in machine learning using a formalization of this principle. Here we try to provide some theoretical justification for causal inference methods based upon such a "causally asymmetric" interpretation of Occam's Razor. To this end, we discuss toy models of cause-effect relations from classical and quantum physics as well as computer science in the context of various aspects of complexity. We argue that this asymmetry of the statistical dependences between cause and effect has a thermodynamic origin. The essential link is the tendency of the environment to provide independent background noise realized by physical systems that are initially uncorrelated with the system under consideration rather than being finally uncorrelated. This link extends ideas from the literature relating Reichenbach's principle of the common cause to the second law.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In real-life statistical data, it seems that conditional probabilities for the effect given their causes tend to be less complex and smoother than conditionals for causes...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.