Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Do single photons tunnel faster than light?

arXiv
Authors: Herbert G. Winful

Year

2007

Paper ID

49237

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

94

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Experiments done in the early 1990's produced a surprising result: that single photons pass through a photonic tunnel barrier with a group velocity faster than the vacuum speed of light. Subsequent experiments with classical pulses have also revealed apparent superluminal group velocities as well as tunneling times that saturate with barrier length, a phenomenon known as the Hartman effect. In this paper we show that the measured delays are in fact cavity lifetimes as opposed to transit times. This interpretation resolves the Hartman paradox and shows that tunneling is not superluminal as widely believed.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Experiments done in the early 1990's produced a surprising result: that single photons pass through a photonic tunnel barrier with a group velocity faster than the vacuum speed...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #49237 #68456 Analytic Properties of the Jost... #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68453 Weak wave turbulence as a precu... #68449 Scale-Invariant Open Quantum Sy...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.