Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Dyson-Index-Like Behavior of Bures Separability Functions
arXiv
Authors: Paul B. Slater
Year
2007
Paper ID
49212
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
141
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We conduct a study based on the Bures (minimal monotone) metric, analogous to that recently reported for the Hilbert-Schmidt (flat or Euclidean) metric (arXiv:0704.3723v2). Among the interesting results obtained there had been proportionalities--in exact correspondence to the Dyson indices β= 1, 2, 4 of random matrix theory--between the fourth, second and first powers of the separability functions S_{type}(μ) for real, complex and quaternionic qubit-qubit scenarios, Here μ=\sqrt{\frac{ρ_{11} ρ_{44}}{ρ_{22} ρ_{33}}}, with ρbeing a 4 x 4 density matrix. Separability functions have proved useful--in the framework of the Bloore (correlation coefficient/off-diagonal scaling) parameterization of density matrices--for the calculation of separability probabilities. We find--for certain, basic simple scenarios (in which the diagonal entries of ρare unrestricted, and one or two off-diagonal [real, complex or quaternionic] pairs of entries are nonzero) --that these proportionalities no longer strictly hold in the Bures case, but do come remarkably close to holding.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We conduct a study based on the Bures (minimal monotone) metric, analogous to that recently reported for the Hilbert-Schmidt (flat or Euclidean) metric (arXiv:0704.3723v2).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.