Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Hypergraph-theoretic charaterizations for LOCC incomparable ensembles of multipartite CAT states
arXiv
Authors: Arijit Ghosh, Sudebkumar Prasant Pal, Anupam Prakash, Virendra Singh Shekhawat
Year
2007
Paper ID
49200
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
184
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Using graphs and hypergraphs to systematically model collections of arbitrary subsets of parties representing {\it ensembles (or collections)} of shared multipartite CAT states, we study transformations between such {\it ensembles} under {\it local operations and classical communication (LOCC)}. We show using partial entropic criteria, that any two such distinct ensembles represented by {\it r-uniform hypergraphs} with the same number of hyperedges (CAT states), are LOCC incomparable for even integers rgeq 2, generalizing results in \cite{mscthesis,sin:pal:kum:sri}. We show that the cardinality of the largest set of mutually LOCC incomparable ensembles represented by r-uniform hypergraphs for even rgeq 2, is exponential in the number of parties. We also demonstrate LOCC incomparability between two ensembles represented by 3-uniform hypergraphs where partial entropic criteria do not help in establishing incomparability. Further we characterize LOCC comparability of EPR graphs in a model where LOCC is restricted to teleportation and edge destruction. We show that this model is equivalent to one in which LOCC transformations are carried out through a sequence of operations where each operation adds at most one new EPR pair.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Using graphs and hypergraphs to systematically model collections of arbitrary subsets of parties representing it ensembles (or collections) of shared multipartite CAT states...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.