Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Optimized Double-well quantum interferometry with Gaussian squeezed-states
arXiv
Authors: Y. P. Huang, M. G. Moore
Year
2007
Paper ID
49080
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
137
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A Mach-Zender interferometer with a gaussian number-difference squeezed input state can exhibit sub-shot-noise phase resolution over a large phase-interval. We obtain the optimal level of squeezing for a given phase-interval Δθ0 and particle number N, with the resulting phase-estimation uncertainty smoothly approaching 3.5/N as Δθ0 approaches 10/N, achieved with highly squeezed states near the Fock regime. We then analyze an adaptive measurement scheme which allows any phase on (-π/2,π/2) to be measured with a precision of 3.5/N requiring only a few measurements, even for very large N. We obtain an asymptotic scaling law of Δθapprox \(2.1+3.2ln(ln(NtottanΔθ0\)))/Ntot, resulting in a final precision of approx 10/Ntot. This scheme can be readily implemented in a double-well Bose-Einstein condensate system, as the optimal input states can be obtained by adiabatic manipulation of the double-well ground state.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A Mach-Zender interferometer with a gaussian number-difference squeezed input state can exhibit sub-shot-noise phase resolution over a large phase-interval.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.