Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Simulation

Raman-induced limits to efficient squeezing in optical fibers

arXiv
Authors: Ruifang Dong, Joel Heersink, Joel F. Corney, Peter D. Drummond, Ulrik L. Andersen, Gerd Leuchs

Year

2007

Paper ID

49073

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

95

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We report new experiments on polarization squeezing using ultrashort photonic pulses in a single pass of a birefringent fiber. We measure what is to our knowledge a record squeezing of -6.8 +/- 0.3 dB in optical fibers which when corrected for linear losses is -10.4 +/- 0.8 dB. The measured polarization squeezing as a function of optical pulse energy, which spans a wide range from 3.5-178.8 pJ, shows a very good agreement with the quantum simulations and for the first time we see the experimental proof that Raman effects limit and reduce squeezing at high pulse energy.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We report new experiments on polarization squeezing using ultrashort photonic pulses in a single pass of a birefringent fiber.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #49073 #69038 Physically Constrained Ensemble... #69023 Scalable Quantum Algorithms for... #68990 Driving Exchange Interaction in... #68985 Floquet Entanglement Generation...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.