Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Qudits of composite dimension, mutually unbiased bases and projective ring geometry

arXiv
Authors: Michel Planat, Anne-Céline Baboin

Year

2007

Paper ID

49061

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

99

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The d2 Pauli operators attached to a composite qudit in dimension d may be mapped to the vectors of the symplectic module mathcal{Z}d2 $mathcal{Z}d$ the modular ring. As a result, perpendicular vectors correspond to commuting operators, a free cyclic submodule to a maximal commuting set, and disjoint such sets to mutually unbiased bases. For dimensions d=6, 10, 15, 12, and 18, the fine structure and the incidence between maximal commuting sets is found to reproduce the projective line over the rings mathcal{Z}6, mathcal{Z}10, mathcal{Z}15, mathcal{Z}6 times mathbf{F}4 and mathcal{Z}6 times mathcal{Z}3, respectively.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The d^2 Pauli operators attached to a composite qudit in dimension d may be mapped to the vectors of the symplectic module mathcalZd^2 mathcalZd the modular ring.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #49061 #68456 Analytic Properties of the Jost... #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68453 Weak wave turbulence as a precu... #68449 Scale-Invariant Open Quantum Sy...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.