Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Tackling instabilities of quantum Krylov subspace methods: an analysis of the numerical and statistical errors
arXiv
Authors: Maria Gabriela Jordão Oliveira, Karl Michael Ziems, Nina Glaser
Year
2026
Paper ID
48926
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
139
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Krylov subspace methods are among the most extensively studied early fault-tolerant quantum algorithms for estimating ground-state energies of quantum systems. However, the rapid onset of ill-conditioning might make accurate energies difficult or even impossible to retrieve. In this communication, we analyse the numerical stability and statistical problems of these methods using numerical simulations both in the presence and absence of sampling noise. While in ideal numerical simulations the generalized eigenvalue problem indeed becomes unstable with increased Krylov subspace size, we find that, in realistic noisy settings, these methods do not primarily suffer from ill-conditioning. Instead, statistical fluctuations dominate and can prevent reliable solution extraction unless appropriate regularization or filtering techniques are employed. We consequently introduce two new metrics, the imaginary and unitary filters, that successfully assess the reliability of the obtained solutions without any knowledge of the true eigenspectrum.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Krylov subspace methods are among the most extensively studied early fault-tolerant quantum algorithms for estimating ground-state energies of quantum systems.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.