Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Feynman's linear divergence problem

arXiv
Authors: Alexander Sakhnovich, Lev Sakhnovich

Year

2026

Paper ID

48920

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

91

Citations

0

Abstract

First, we consider generalized wave and scattering operators and derive modifications of commutation relations (between scattering operators and unperturbed operators) when the corresponding deviation factors behave as exp\{i t {mathcal C}pm\} for t→ pm infty. Then, we construct so called secondary generalized scattering operators for the related case of linear divergence in QED, which gives a positive answer (in that case) to the well-known problem of J. R. Oppenheimer regarding scattering operators in QED: "Can the procedure be freed of the expansion in varepsilon and carried out rigorously?"

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • First, we consider generalized wave and scattering operators and derive modifications of commutation relations (between scattering operators and unperturbed operators) when the...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #48920 #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69030 Non-Hermitian Crystalline Braid... #69029 Higher-order Symmetric Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-15 02:47:12

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.