!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Quantum Machine Learning
A Comparative Study of Hybrid Quantum and Classical Genetic Algorithms in Portfolio Optimization
arXiv
Authors: Romeu Rossi Junior, José Augusto Miranda Nacif, Leonardo Antônio Mendes Souza, Marcus Henrique Soares Mendes
Year
2026
Paper ID
48913
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
71
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This work investigates the performance of a Hybrid Quantum Genetic Algorithm (HQGA) compared to a classical Genetic Algorithm (GA) for solving the portfolio optimization problem. Our results indicate that the HQGA converges faster to the optimal solution than its classical counterpart, while also maintaining a higher level of population diversity throughout the optimization process. In addition, the HQGA requires significantly fewer evaluations-to-solution than a brute-force approach to reach the global optimum.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This work investigates the performance of a Hybrid Quantum Genetic Algorithm (HQGA) compared to a classical Genetic Algorithm (GA) for solving the portfolio optimization problem.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.