Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Gate Fidelity Benchmarking
Precision Characterization of the 2D5/2 State and Quadratic Zeeman Coefficient in 171Yb^+
arXiv
Authors: T. R. Tan, C. L. Edmunds, A. R. Milne, M. J. Biercuk, C. Hempel
Year
2020
Paper ID
489
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
92
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We report measurements of the branching fraction, hyperfine constant, and second-order Zeeman coefficient of the D5/2 level in 171Yb^+ with up to two orders-of-magnitude improvement in precision compared to previously reported values. We estimate the electric quadrupole reduced matrix element of the S1/2 leftrightarrow D5/2 transition to be 12.5(4) e a02. Furthermore, we determine the transition frequency of the F7/2 leftrightarrow 1D[3/2]3/2 at 760 nm with a sim25-fold improvement in precision. These measurements provide benchmarks for quantum-many-body atomic-physics calculations and provide valuable data for efforts to improve quantum information processors based on Yb^+.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Gate Fidelity & Benchmarking research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We report measurements of the branching fraction, hyperfine constant, and second-order Zeeman coefficient of the D5/2 level in ^171Yb^+ with up to two orders-of-magnitude...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.