Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Permutationally symmetric molecular aggregates
arXiv
Authors: Sricharan Raghavan-Chitra, Arghadip Koner, Joel Yuen-Zhou
Year
2026
Paper ID
48865
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
200
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Linear optical spectra of molecular aggregates are often approximated by classical optics methods such as the discrete-dipole approximation (DDA), coherent exciton scattering (CES), and coherent potential approximation (CPA), where the only quantum-mechanical input to the calculation is the linear susceptibility of the monomers. However, the limits of validity of these classical optics methods remain opaque. Here, starting from a quantum mechanical Hamiltonian for the aggregate, we identify a limit where DDA/CPA/CES is exact: all-to-all coupled permutationally symmetric aggregates of N → infty monomers. The permutational symmetry of this molecular version of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model, which is closely related to that of the molecular polariton problem of many identical molecules coupled to a single-cavity mode, allows us to borrow recent techniques developed for the latter. In particular, we identify a 1/N expansion that corrects the classical optics limit with finite N corrections to the linear response of the aggregate. These corrections feature as Raman-like transitions of a single monomer. We illustrate these findings with calculations on the very physically-relevant setup of a homodimer. Our findings clarify how quantum optical features that go beyond classical optics can already be present in simple arrays of quantum emitters such as molecular aggregates.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Linear optical spectra of molecular aggregates are often approximated by classical optics methods such as the discrete-dipole approximation (DDA), coherent exciton scattering...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.