Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Demonstrating Record Fidelity for the Quantum Fourier Transform
arXiv
Authors: Philipp Aumann, Michael Fellner, David Alber, Max Cykiert, Christoph Fleckenstein, Roeland ter Hoeven, Leo Stenzel, Riccardo J. Valencia-Tortora, Wolfgang Lechner
Year
2026
Paper ID
48858
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
96
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We demonstrate the Parity Architecture on quantum hardware, using the quantum Fourier transform (QFT) as a benchmark. As a result, a record performance in both fidelity and qubit count is achieved using quantum processors with a native CZ-based instruction set. On the IBM Heron r3 chip, a process fidelity of the QFT algorithm of {F approx 10-2} for {N=50} qubits is achieved. The scaling of the speedup compared to previous swap-based methods is super-exponential mathcal{O}\(exp(N2\)). Furthermore, we show that the scaling can be improved further by including iSWAP gates in the instruction set.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We demonstrate the Parity Architecture on quantum hardware, using the quantum Fourier transform (QFT) as a benchmark.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.