Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Demonstrating Record Fidelity for the Quantum Fourier Transform

arXiv
Authors: Philipp Aumann, Michael Fellner, David Alber, Max Cykiert, Christoph Fleckenstein, Roeland ter Hoeven, Leo Stenzel, Riccardo J. Valencia-Tortora, Wolfgang Lechner

Year

2026

Paper ID

48858

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

96

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We demonstrate the Parity Architecture on quantum hardware, using the quantum Fourier transform (QFT) as a benchmark. As a result, a record performance in both fidelity and qubit count is achieved using quantum processors with a native CZ-based instruction set. On the IBM Heron r3 chip, a process fidelity of the QFT algorithm of {F approx 10-2} for {N=50} qubits is achieved. The scaling of the speedup compared to previous swap-based methods is super-exponential mathcal{O}\(exp(N2\)). Furthermore, we show that the scaling can be improved further by including iSWAP gates in the instruction set.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We demonstrate the Parity Architecture on quantum hardware, using the quantum Fourier transform (QFT) as a benchmark.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #48858 #69039 SAT, MaxSAT, and SMT for QLDPC ... #69038 Physically Constrained Ensemble... #69023 Scalable Quantum Algorithms for... #69016 Solution of the Equation-of-Mot...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.