Quick Navigation

Topics

Superconducting Qubits

From coupled mathbb{Z}3 Rabi models to the mathbb{Z}3 Potts model

arXiv
Authors: Anatoliy I. Lotkov, Valerii K. Kozin, Denis V. Kurlov, Jelena Klinovaja, Daniel Loss

Year

2026

Paper ID

48752

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

89

Citations

0

Abstract

We study mathbb{Z}3-symmetric Rabi model that describes a three-level system coupled to two bosonic modes. We derive a mapping of the two-mode mathbb{Z}3 Rabi model onto a qubit-boson ring. This mapping allows us to formulate a realistic implementation of the mathbb{Z}3 Rabi model based on superconducting qubits. It also provides context for the previously proposed optomechanical implementation of the mathbb{Z}3 Rabi model. In addition, we propose a physical implementation of the mathbb{Z}3 Potts model via a coupled chain of mathbb{Z}3 Rabi models.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study mathbbZ3-symmetric Rabi model that describes a three-level system coupled to two bosonic modes.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #48752 #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69022 Contacting Josephson Junctions ... #69011 Improved Cryogenic Photodiode O... #68999 Suppression of Quasiparticle Po...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-14 03:22:57

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.