Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Generalized Complexity Distances and Non-Invertible Symmetries
arXiv
Authors: Jonathan J. Heckman, Rebecca J. Hicks, Chitraang Murdia
Year
2026
Paper ID
48738
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
138
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Non-invertible symmetries of a quantum field theory (QFT) are a natural generalization of unitary symmetries, but in which the product of operators does not satisfy a group multiplication law. We show that such symmetry operations on states define a collection of quantum gates for a parallel quantum computation scheme that includes post-selection / projection as a gate. Structures such as gate complexity and more geometric complexity measures generalize to this setting. We provide a class of distance / distinguishability measures that extend the standard notion of distance for Lie groups to both continuous and discrete non-invertible symmetries, as well as more general linear combinations of unitary quantum gates. We illustrate these considerations by computing the distance between non-invertible symmetries in some 4D and 2D QFTs. We find that the simple objects of a symmetry category can be highly complex computationally.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Non-invertible symmetries of a quantum field theory (QFT) are a natural generalization of unitary symmetries, but in which the product of operators does not satisfy a group...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.