Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Relativistic single-electron wavepacket in quantum electromagnetic fields II: Quantum radiation emitted by a uniformly accelerated electron
arXiv
Authors: Shih-Yuin Lin, Bei-Lok Hu
Year
2026
Paper ID
48618
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
157
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We compute the quantum radiation emitted by wavepackets of relativistic single electrons, both at rest and undergoing uniform acceleration in the Minkowski vacuum of the electromagnetic field. We find that the cubic terms in the original nonlinear action of electrodynamics should be considered in obtaining the quantum radiation to the leading order. We show that the quantum radiation from a single-electron wavepacket at rest vanishes exactly. For a uniformly accelerated electron, the quantum radiated power has secular growth in the long-time regime. We demonstrate that this secular growth has a classical interpretation, and argue that the resummed quantum radiation at late times would not diverge. Regarding experimental proposals for the detection of the Unruh effect from the quantum radiation in the `blind spots' of classical radiation we ascertain that quantum corrections in the two blind spots are fully contributed by the transverse deviation correlators, where the dominant contributions are irrelevant to the Unruh effect in electron microscopes.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We compute the quantum radiation emitted by wavepackets of relativistic single electrons, both at rest and undergoing uniform acceleration in the Minkowski vacuum of the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.