Quick Navigation
Topics
Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing
Quantum Chemistry
Temperature-Triggered Structural Boundary between Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots and Graphene Quantum Dots.
PubMed
Authors: Singh VP, Singh AK
Year
2026
Paper ID
48598
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
148
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Nitrogen-doped carbon dots (N-CDs) and nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots (N-GQDs) are closely related carbon nanostructures whose distinction is often obscured by variations in synthesis chemistry. Here, we elucidate the structural boundary between these two materials by synthesizing N-CDs and N-GQDs through an identical citric acid-urea solvothermal route in dimethylformamide, differing only in reaction temperature. Electron microscopy and selected-area electron diffraction show that N-CDs consist of predominantly amorphous carbon frameworks, whereas N-GQDs exhibit nanocrystalline graphene domains with well-defined lattice fringes and graphitic diffraction rings. Optical absorption and photoluminescence measurements reveal stronger π-π* transitions and reduced emission broadening in N-GQDs, consistent with enhanced sp conjugation. Temperature- and frequency-dependent dielectric measurements further distinguish the two systems, with N-CDs displaying stronger dielectric dispersion arising from interfacial and defect-related polarization. The results establish distinct structural outcomes of a common chemical pathway and clarify their classification based on correlated structural, optical, and dielectric signatures.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Nitrogen-doped carbon dots (N-CDs) and nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots (N-GQDs) are closely related carbon nanostructures whose distinction is often obscured by variations...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.