Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Photonic Quantum Computing
Quantum Readout Measurement Hardware
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Eight-fold signal amplification of a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector using a multiple-avalanche architecture
arXiv
Authors: Qingyuan Zhao, Adam McCaughan, Andrew Dane, Faraz Najafi, Francesco Bellei, Domenico De Fazio, Kristen Sunter, Yachin Ivry, Karl K. Berggren
Year
2014
Paper ID
48223
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
79
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Superconducting nanowire avalanche single-photon detectors (SNAPs) with n parallel nanowires are advantageous over single-nanowire detectors because their output signal amplitude scales linearly with n. However, the SNAP architecture has not been viably demonstrated for n > 4. To increase n for larger signal amplification, we designed a multi-stage, successive-avalanche architecture which used nanowires, connected via choke inductors in a binary-tree layout. We demonstrated an avalanche detector with n = 8 parallel nanowires and achieved eight-fold signal amplification, with a timing jitter of 54 ps.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Superconducting nanowire avalanche single-photon detectors (SNAPs) with n parallel nanowires are advantageous over single-nanowire detectors because their output signal...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.