Quick Navigation

Topics

Topological Quantum Computing Quantum Simulation

U(1)times U(1) Symmetry Protected Topological Order in Gutzwiller Wave Functions

arXiv
Authors: Zheng-Xin Liu, Jia-Wei Mei, Peng Ye, Xiao-Gang Wen

Year

2014

Paper ID

48179

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

138

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Gutzwiller projection is a way to construct many-body wave functions that could carry topological order or symmetry protected topological (SPT) order. However, an important issue is to determine whether or not a given Gutzwiller-projected wave functions (GWF) carries a non-trivial SPT order, and which SPT order is carried by the wavefunction. In this paper, we numerically study the SPT order in a spin S = 1 GWF on the Kagome lattice. Using the standard Monte Carlo method, we directly confirm that the GWF has (1) gapped bulk with short-range correlations, (2) a trivial topological order via nondegenerate ground state, and zero topological entanglement entropy, (3) a non-trivial U(1)times U(1) SPT order via the Hall conductances of the protecting U(1)times U(1) symmetry, and (4) symmetry protected gapless boundary. This represents numerical evidence of continuous symmetry protected topological order in two-dimensional bosonic lattice systems.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #48179 #67322 Super-diffusive transport in tw... #67300 Non-invertible SPT, gauging and... #67354 Realizing triality and $p$-alit... #67352 Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Theorem wit...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.