Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Quantum pattern matching fast on average

arXiv
Authors: Ashley Montanaro

Year

2014

Paper ID

48167

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

127

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The d-dimensional pattern matching problem is to find an occurrence of a pattern of length m times dots times m within a text of length n times dots times n, with n ge m. This task models various problems in text and image processing, among other application areas. This work describes a quantum algorithm which solves the pattern matching problem for random patterns and texts in time widetilde{O}((n/m)d/2 2^{O\(d3/2sqrt{log m}\)}). For large m this is super-polynomially faster than the best possible classical algorithm, which requires time widetildeΩ( (n/m)d + nd/2 ). The algorithm is based on the use of a quantum subroutine for finding hidden shifts in d dimensions, which is a variant of algorithms proposed by Kuperberg.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The d-dimensional pattern matching problem is to find an occurrence of a pattern of length m times dots times m within a text of length n times dots times n, with n ge m.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #48167 #69983 Spectral Leakage and Masking Ef... #69982 Dimensionality Reduction of QAO... #69981 A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Appr... #69980 Complexity Inequalities for Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.