Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Non-catastrophic resonant states in one dimensional scattering from a rising exponential potential
arXiv
Authors: Zafar Ahmed, Lakshmi Prakash, Shashin Pavaskar
Year
2014
Paper ID
48118
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
107
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Investigation of scattering from rising potentials has just begun, these unorthodox potentials have earlier gone unexplored. Here, we obtain reflection amplitude (r(E)) for scattering from a two-piece rising exponential potential: V\(xle 0\)=V1\[1-e-2x/a\], V(x > 0)=V2\[e2x/b-1\], where V1,2>0. This potential is repulsive and rising for x>0; it is attractive and diverging to $-infty$ for x<0. The complex energy poles ${cal E}n= En-iΓn/2, Γn>0$ of r(E) manifest as resonances. Wigner's reflection time-delay displays peaks at energies E\(approx En\) but the eigenstates do not show spatial catastrophe for E={cal E}n.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Investigation of scattering from rising potentials has just begun, these unorthodox potentials have earlier gone unexplored.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.