Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
QBians Do Not Exist
arXiv
Authors: Christopher A. Fuchs, Blake C. Stacey
Year
2020
Paper ID
481
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
38
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We remark on John Earman's paper "Quantum Bayesianism Assessed" [The Monist 102 (2019), 403--423], illustrating with a number of examples that the quantum "interpretation" Earman critiques and the interpretation known as QBism have almost nothing to do with each other.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We remark on John Earman's paper "Quantum Bayesianism Assessed" [The Monist 102 (2019), 403--423], illustrating with a number of examples that the quantum "interpretation"...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.