Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Chemistry
Extracting molecular potentials from insufficient spectroscopic information
arXiv
Authors: Xuan Li, Sourav Dutta
Year
2014
Paper ID
48000
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
134
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We extend our recently developed inversion method to extract excited state potentials from fluorescence line positions and line strengths. We consider a previous limitation of the method arising due to insufficient input data in cases where the relatively weaker emission data are not experimentally available. We develop a solution to this problem by "regenerating" these weak transition lines via applying a model potential, e.g. a Morse potential. The result of this procedure, illustrated for the Q-branch emission from the lowest three vibrational levels of the B$1 Πstate of LiRb, is shown to have an error of0.29cm^{-1}in the classically allowed region and a global error of5.67cm^{-1}forV\le Eν'=10$. The robustness of this procedure is also demonstrated by considering the statistical error in the measured line intensities.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We extend our recently developed inversion method to extract excited state potentials from fluorescence line positions and line strengths.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.