Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry

'Quantum Cheshire Cat' as Simple Quantum Interference

arXiv
Authors: Raul Corrêa, Marcelo França Santos, C. H. Monken, Pablo L. Saldanha

Year

2014

Paper ID

47763

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

119

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In a recent work, Aharonov et al. suggested that a photon could be separated from its polarization in an experiment involving pre- and post-selection [New J. Phys 15, 113015 (2013)]. They named the effect 'quantum Cheshire Cat', in a reference to the cat that is separated from its grin in the novel Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. Following these ideas, Denkmayr et al. performed a neutron interferometric experiment and interpreted the results suggesting that neutrons were separated from their spin [Nat. Commun. 5, 4492 (2014)]. Here we show that these results can be interpreted as simple quantum interference, with no separation between the quantum particle and its internal degree of freedom. We thus hope to clarify the phenomenon with this work, by removing these apparent paradoxes.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In a recent work, Aharonov et al.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #47763 #77848 Smart pH-Sensing Chitosan-Carbo... #77814 Quantum chemical modeling of zi... #77798 Molecular qubits: opportunities... #77795 Machine Learning‐Based Discover...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.