Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication Related

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Spontaneous and parametric processes in warm rubidium vapours

arXiv

Authors: Michał Dąbrowski, Michał Parniak, Daniel Pęcak, Radosław Chrapkiewicz, Wojciech Wasilewski

Year

2014

Paper ID

47571

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Warm rubidium vapours are known to be a versatile medium for a variety of experiments in atomic physics and quantum optics. Here we present experimental results on producing the frequency converted light for quantum applications based on spontaneous and stimulated processes in rubidium vapours. In particular, we study the efficiency of spontaneously initiated stimulated Raman scattering in the Λ-level configuration and conditions of generating the coherent blue light assisted by multi-photon transitions in the diamond-level configuration. Our results will be helpful in search for new types of interfaces between light and atomic quantum memories.

Why This Paper Matters

This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
Warm rubidium vapours are known to be a versatile medium for a variety of experiments in atomic physics and quantum optics.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:1409.3539 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3539 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3539

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0

Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.