Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Chemistry
Distributed multipoles from a robust basis-space implementation of the iterated stockholder atoms procedure
arXiv
Authors: Alston J. Misquitta, Anthony J. Stone, Farhang Fazeli
Year
2014
Paper ID
47403
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
141
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The recently developed iterated stockholder atoms (ISA) approach of Lillestolen and Wheatley Chem. Commun. {bf 2008}, 5909 (2008) offers a powerful method for defining atoms in a molecule. However, the real-space algorithm is known to converge very slowly, if at all. Here we present a robust, basis-space algorithm of the ISA method and demonstrate its applicability on a variety of systems. We show that this algorithm exhibits rapid convergence (taking around 10--80 iterations) with the number of iterations needed being unrelated to the system size or basis set used. Further, we show that the multipole moments calculated using this basis-space ISA method are as good as, or better than those obtained from Stone's distributed multipole analysis J. Chem. Theory Comput. {bf 1}, 1128 (2005 ), exhibiting better convergence properties and resulting in better behaved penetration energies. This can have significant consequences in the development of intermolecular interaction models.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The recently developed iterated stockholder atoms (ISA) approach of Lillestolen and Wheatley (Chem.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.