Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

A probabilistic evolutionary optimization approach to compute quasiparticle braids

arXiv
Authors: Roberto Santana, Ross B. McDonald, Helmut G. Katzgraber

Year

2014

Paper ID

47188

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

155

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Topological quantum computing is an alternative framework for avoiding the quantum decoherence problem in quantum computation. The problem of executing a gate in this framework can be posed as the problem of braiding quasiparticles. Because these are not Abelian, the problem can be reduced to finding an optimal product of braid generators where the optimality is defined in terms of the gate approximation and the braid's length. In this paper we propose the use of different variants of estimation of distribution algorithms to deal with the problem. Furthermore, we investigate how the regularities of the braid optimization problem can be translated into statistical regularities by means of the Boltzmann distribution. We show that our best algorithm is able to produce many solutions that approximates the target gate with an accuracy in the order of 10-6, and have lengths up to 9 times shorter than those expected from braids of the same accuracy obtained with other methods.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #47188 #67360 Quadrupolar resonance spectrosc... #67353 Operational Framework for a Qua... #67351 Quantum-assisted Rendezvous on ... #67347 Evidence of the quantum-optical...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.