Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Upper bounds on quantum query complexity inspired by the Elitzur-Vaidman bomb tester
arXiv
Authors: Cedric Yen-Yu Lin, Han-Hsuan Lin
Year
2014
Paper ID
47170
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
152
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Inspired by the Elitzur-Vaidman bomb testing problem [arXiv:hep-th/9305002], we introduce a new query complexity model, which we call bomb query complexity B(f). We investigate its relationship with the usual quantum query complexity Q(f), and show that B(f)=Θ(Q(f)2). This result gives a new method to upper bound the quantum query complexity: we give a method of finding bomb query algorithms from classical algorithms, which then provide nonconstructive upper bounds on Q(f)=Θ\(sqrt{B(f\)}). We subsequently were able to give explicit quantum algorithms matching our upper bound method. We apply this method on the single-source shortest paths problem on unweighted graphs, obtaining an algorithm with O\(n1.5\) quantum query complexity, improving the best known algorithm of O\(n1.5sqrt{log n}\) [arXiv:quant-ph/0606127]. Applying this method to the maximum bipartite matching problem gives an O\(n1.75\) algorithm, improving the best known trivial O\(n2\) upper bound.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Inspired by the Elitzur-Vaidman bomb testing problem [arXiv:hep-th/9305002], we introduce a new query complexity model, which we call bomb query complexity B(f).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.