You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Constraints on topological order in Mott Insulators
arXiv
Authors: Michael P. Zaletel, Ashvin Vishwanath
Year
2014
Paper ID
47048
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
116
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We point out certain symmetry induced constraints on topological order in Mott Insulators quantum magnets with an odd number of spin $tfrac{1}{2}$ per unit cell. We show, for example, that the double semion topological order is incompatible with time reversal and translation symmetry in Mott insulators. This sharpens the Hastings-Oshikawa-Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorem for 2D quantum magnets, which guarantees that a fully symmetric gapped Mott insulator must be topologically ordered, but is silent on which topological order is permitted. An application of our result is the Kagome lattice quantum antiferromagnet where recent numerical calculations of entanglement entropy indicate a ground state compatible with either toric code or double semion topological order. Our result rules out the latter possibility.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We point out certain symmetry induced constraints on topological order in Mott Insulators quantum magnets with an odd number of spin tfrac12 per unit cell.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.