Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Improved HDRG decoders for qudit and non-Abelian quantum error correction
arXiv
Authors: Adrian Hutter, Daniel Loss, James R. Wootton
Year
2014
Paper ID
46947
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
188
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Hard-decision renormalization group (HDRG) decoders are an important class of decoding algorithms for topological quantum error correction. Due to their versatility, they have been used to decode systems with fractal logical operators, color codes, qudit topological codes, and non-Abelian systems. In this work, we develop a method of performing HDRG decoding which combines strenghts of existing decoders and further improves upon them. In particular, we increase the minimal number of errors necessary for a logical error in a system of linear size L from Θ\(L2/3\) to Ω\(L1-ε\) for any ε>0. We apply our algorithm to decoding D\(mathbb{Z}d\) quantum double models and a non-Abelian anyon model with Fibonacci-like fusion rules, and show that it indeed significantly outperforms previous HDRG decoders. Furthermore, we provide the first study of continuous error correction with imperfect syndrome measurements for the D\(mathbb{Z}d\) quantum double models. The parallelized runtime of our algorithm is poly\(log L\) for the perfect measurement case. In the continuous case with imperfect syndrome measurements, the averaged runtime is O(1) for Abelian systems, while continuous error correction for non-Abelian anyons stays an open problem.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Hard-decision renormalization group (HDRG) decoders are an important class of decoding algorithms for topological quantum error correction.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.