Quick Navigation

Topics

Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing Quantum State Preparation Representation Quantum Chemistry

Finite-Basis-Set Approach to the Two-Center Heteronuclear Dirac Problem

DOAJ
Authors: Artem A. Kotov, Dmitry A. Glazov, Aleksei V. Malyshev, Vladimir M. Shabaev, Günter Plunien

Year

2022

Paper ID

4640

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

122

Citations

4

Abstract

The rigorous two-center approach based on the dual-kinetically balanced finite-basis-set expansion is applied to one-electron, heteronuclear diatomic Bi-Au, U-Pb, and Cf-U quasimolecules. The obtained <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>1</mn><mi>σ</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> ground-state energies are compared with previous calculations, when possible. Upon analysis of three different placements of the coordinate system’s origin in the monopole approximation of the two-center potential: (1) in the middle, between the nuclei, (2) in the center of the heavy nucleus, and (3) in the center of the light nucleus, a substantial difference between the results is found. The leading contributions of one-electron quantum electrodynamics (self-energy and vacuum polarization) are evaluated within the monopole approximation as well.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #4640 #67340 Ultra-sensitive solid-state org... #67337 Parameterization and optimizabi... #67310 Women for Quantum -- Manifesto ... #67294 Unveiling the 3D Morphology of ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-04 06:10:44

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.