Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Thermodynamics

Post-firewall paradoxes

arXiv
Authors: Samuel L. Braunstein, Stefano Pirandola

Year

2014

Paper ID

46257

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

137

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The preeminent view that evaporating black holes should simply be smaller black holes has been challenged by the firewall paradox. In particular, this paradox suggests that something different occurs once a black hole has evaporated to one-half its original surface area. Here we derive variations of the firewall paradox by tracking the thermodynamic entropy within a black hole across its entire lifetime. Our approach sweeps away many unnecessary assumptions, allowing us to demonstrate a paradox exists even after its initial onset (when conventional assumptions render earlier analyses invalid). Our results suggest that not only is the formation of a firewall the most natural resolution, but provides a mechanism for it. Finally, although firewalls cannot have evolved for modest-sized black holes, within the age of the universe, we speculate on the implications if they were ever unambiguously observed.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The preeminent view that evaporating black holes should simply be smaller black holes has been challenged by the firewall paradox.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #46257 #68438 Anomalous Decay of Quantum Reso...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.