Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Qubits, Weyl spinors, quantum NOT gates, and dynamical decoupling
arXiv
Authors: R. Romero
Year
2014
Paper ID
46108
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
114
Citations
N/A
Abstract
An equivalence is established between orthogonal pure state qubits on the Bloch sphere and massless Weyl spinors, when the Bloch vector is taken as the physical three-momentum. A family of unitary, coordinate dependent transformations is obtained which connects orthogonal combinations of the basis states of a two-level quantum system. It is shown that a subset of these transformations possesses the novel feature of effecting a point inversion by means of a rotation. For qubits, these transformations act as quantum NOT/parity gates, and also as flipping operators that exactly cancel decoherence in a dynamical decoupling setting. For Weyl spinors they provide, at the relativistic quantum level, a unitary symmetry transformation for the Weyl equations.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- An equivalence is established between orthogonal pure state qubits on the Bloch sphere and massless Weyl spinors, when the Bloch vector is taken as the physical three-momentum.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.