Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Microscopic models for charge-noise-induced dephasing of solid-state qubits

arXiv
Authors: Félix Beaudoin, W. A. Coish

Year

2014

Paper ID

45854

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

120

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Several experiments have shown qubit coherence decay of the form exp\[-\(t/T2\)^α\] due to environmental charge-noise fluctuations. We present a microscopic description for temperature dependences of the parameters T2 and α. Our description is appropriate to qubits in semiconductors interacting with spurious two-level charge fluctuators coupled to a thermal bath. We find distinct power-law dependences of T2 and α on temperature depending on the nature of the interaction of the fluctuators with the associated bath. We consider fluctuator dynamics induced by first- and second-order tunneling with a continuum of delocalized electron states. We also study one- and two-phonon processes for fluctuators in either GaAs or Si. These results can be used to identify dominant charge-dephasing mechanisms and suppress them.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Several experiments have shown qubit coherence decay of the form exp[-(t/T2)^α] due to environmental charge-noise fluctuations.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #45854

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.