Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Thermodynamics

Measuring work and heat in ultracold quantum gases

arXiv
Authors: G. De Chiara, A. J. Roncaglia, J. P. Paz

Year

2014

Paper ID

45814

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

112

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We propose a feasible experimental scheme to direct measure heat and work in cold atomic setups. The method is based on a recent proposal which shows that work is a positive operator valued measure (POVM). In the present contribution, we demonstrate that the interaction between the atoms and the light polarisation of a probe laser allows us to implement such POVM. In this way the work done on or extracted from the atoms after a given process is encoded in the light quadrature that can be measured with a standard homodyne detection. The protocol allows one to verify fluctuation theorems and study properties of the non-unitary dynamics of a given thermodynamic process.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We propose a feasible experimental scheme to direct measure heat and work in cold atomic setups.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #45814 #68474 Concentration-Free Quantum Kern... #68470 A fluxonium qubit-based hybrid ... #68469 Pitfalls when tackling the expo... #68467 Hong-Ou-Mandel interference of ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.