Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Nonlocal random motions: The trapping problem

arXiv
Authors: Piotr Garbaczewski, Mariusz Żaba

Year

2014

Paper ID

45740

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

112

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Lévy stable (jump-type) processes are examples of intrinsically nonlocal random motions. This property becomes a serious obstacle if one attempts to model conditions under which a particular Lévy process may be subject to physically implementable manipulations, whose ultimate goal is to confine the random motion in a spatially finite, possibly mesoscopic trap. We analyze thisissue for an exemplary case of the Cauchy process in a finiteinterval. Qualitatively, our observations extend to general jump-type processes that are driven by non-gaussian noises, classified by the integral part of the Lévy-Khintchine formula.For clarity of arguments we discuss, as a reference model, the classic case of the Brownian motion in the interval.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Lévy stable (jump-type) processes are examples of intrinsically nonlocal random motions.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #45740 #69978 Distribution Complexity of Elec... #69974 Hierarchical separation of rela... #69964 Bounded-depth spacetime lattice... #69945 Phase Stable Integrated Delay L...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.