Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Foundations
Comment on "Teleportation of Three-Qubit State via Six-qubit Cluster State"
arXiv
Authors: Anindita Banerjee, Chitra Shukla
Year
2014
Paper ID
45710
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
122
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Recently Yu and Sun [Int. J. Theor. Phys. DOI 10.1007/s10773-014-2360-x] have presented probabilistic teleportation of 3-qubit cat state via 6-qubit cluster state. The success probability depends on absolute value of only two of the coefficients of cluster state i.e. |c|^2 + |d|^2. We have demonstrated the feasibility to teleport 3-qubit cat state via 2-qubit non maximally entangled Bell state instead of a complex state like 6-qubit non maximally entangled cluster state. In this comment we have prescribed an optimal protocol for teleportation of n-qubit state of the form α|x> + β|bar{x}>_n via non maximally entangled Bell state a|00> + b|11> henceforth allowing teleportation of n-qubit state via 2-qubit Bell state. The success probability of the prescribed protocol is |b|^2.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Recently Yu and Sun [Int.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.