Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Scalable Determination of Penalization Weights for Constrained Optimizations on Approximate Solvers
arXiv
Authors: Edoardo Alessandroni, Sergi Ramos-Calderer, Michel Krispin, Fritz Schinkel, Stefan Walter, Martin Kliesch, Leandro Aolita, Ingo Roth
Year
2026
Paper ID
45609
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
117
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) provides problem formulations for various computational problems that can be solved with dedicated QUBO solvers, which can be based on classical or quantum computation. A common approach to constrained combinatorial optimization problems is to enforce the constraints in the QUBO formulation by adding penalization terms. Penalization introduces an additional hyperparameter that significantly affects the solver's efficacy: the relative weight between the objective terms and the penalization terms. We develop a pre-computation strategy for determining penalization weights with provable guarantees for Gibbs solvers and polynomial complexity for broad problem classes. Experiments across diverse problems and solver architectures, including large-scale instances on Fujitsu's Digital Annealer, show robust performance and order-of-magnitude speedups over existing heuristics.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) provides problem formulations for various computational problems that can be solved with dedicated QUBO solvers, which can be...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.