Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Non-reciprocal Ising gauge theory
arXiv
Authors: Nilotpal Chakraborty, Anton Souslov, Claudio Castelnovo
Year
2026
Paper ID
45597
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
163
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Non-reciprocity and geometric frustration enable many-body systems to avoid crystalline order and instead exhibit complex, liquid-like behavior. Here we show that their interplay is richer than the sum of its parts, leading to surprising structural and dynamical phenomena. In our minimal model, two copies of Ising gauge theory are non-reciprocally coupled in a way that crucially preserves a local mathbb{Z}2 symmetry. We discover that the combined Wilson loop observable of the two copies exhibits linear asymptotic scaling, with a quasiparticle-pair confinement length tuned by the strength of the non-reciprocal coupling. Key dynamical features are revealed in the behavior of individual deconfined excitations due to strong interactions induced by the non-reciprocity, leading to motion on a critical percolation cluster that follows a self-avoiding trail. Mapping from this quasiparticle dynamics onto the magnetic noise spectrum, we discover that non-reciprocity tunes topological logarithmic contributions and causes long-lived metastable states due to quasiparticle trapping. Our work opens the way for broader investigations of geometrically frustrated non-reciprocity.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Non-reciprocity and geometric frustration enable many-body systems to avoid crystalline order and instead exhibit complex, liquid-like behavior.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.