Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Tight Quantum Lower Bound for k-Distinctness

arXiv
Authors: Aleksandrs Belovs

Year

2026

Paper ID

45566

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

115

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a new quantum query lower bound framework. It is inspired by Zhandry's compressed oracle technique, but it also subsumes the polynomial method as a special case. Compared to Zhandry's technique, our approach has two key differences. First, we do not use any oracles (except for the standard input oracle), and define "knowledge" directly through the expansion of the state of the algorithm in the Fourier basis. Second, we allow arbitrary probability distributions of inputs. We show how this framework behaves on the problem of finding equal elements in the input string. In particular, we demonstrate its power by proving a first tight quantum query lower bound for the k-Distinctness problem.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this paper, we introduce a new quantum query lower bound framework.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #45566 #68474 Concentration-Free Quantum Kern... #68470 A fluxonium qubit-based hybrid ... #68469 Pitfalls when tackling the expo... #68467 Hong-Ou-Mandel interference of ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.