Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Deviations from thermal light statistics in ensembles of independent two-level emitters

arXiv
Authors: Manuel Bojer, André Cidrim, Romain Bachelard, Joachim von Zanthier

Year

2026

Paper ID

45526

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

97

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We investigate the light statistics of an ensemble of independent motionless two-level atoms in a product state. We identify the conditions under which the cold atomic ensemble emits thermal light statistics characterized by the Gaussian Moment Theorem. For the theorem to hold, we derive for each correlation order two conditions on the atom number and the ratio of coherent to incoherent light emission. We further discuss their validity for atoms either in a pure or mixed state. Our results contribute to the understanding of the generation of thermal light by two-level atoms without interactions among the emitters.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We investigate the light statistics of an ensemble of independent motionless two-level atoms in a product state.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #45526 #69039 SAT, MaxSAT, and SMT for QLDPC ... #69038 Physically Constrained Ensemble... #69023 Scalable Quantum Algorithms for... #69016 Solution of the Equation-of-Mot...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.