Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Necessary and sufficient conditions for the N-representability of functionals of the one-electron reduced density matrix

arXiv
Authors: Jannis Erhard, Paul W. Ayers

Year

2026

Paper ID

45503

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

99

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We establish necessary and sufficient conditions for the N-representability of the universal one-electron reduced density matrix functional. Functionals satisfying these conditions are guaranteed to yield variational upper bounds on the true energy in one-electron reduced density matrix functional theory, regardless of the strength of the interparticle repulsion. Conversely, any functional violating these conditions will necessarily underestimate the true energy for certain systems. These exact constraints impose a stringent restriction on density matrix functional approximations, as many existing functionals-including the Hartree-Fock functional-appear to violate them. This mathematical formalism, therefore, can guide the development of new approximate functionals and numerical algorithms.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We establish necessary and sufficient conditions for the N-representability of the universal one-electron reduced density matrix functional.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #45503 #69983 Spectral Leakage and Masking Ef... #69982 Dimensionality Reduction of QAO... #69981 A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Appr... #69980 Complexity Inequalities for Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.